Edith Hind is the missing person of the title. She is considered high-risk because she comes from a wealthy socially prominent family London family. Her father is physician to the Royal Family. It is a priority of the powers that be, that this case is solved quickly. Edith is a post-grad Cambridge University student who has all the attributes for a successful future. She is gorgeous, bright and seemingly has an equally perfect boyfriend. On the night she went missing, her flat was left unlocked and open. Two wine glasses and blood were found in the kitchen. Nothing appeared to be missing, her purse and coat were left behind, and other possessions were left undisturbed.
In contrast to Edith is Manon Bradshaw, the Cambridgeshire detective assigned to the case. Manon at 39 is single, morose and angry. (Why are all detectives in crime books flawed?) Luckily for the reader, Manon is more interesting than any other character in the book. I became as much engrossed in her story as in that of the spoiled missing Edith. Manon meets men online, has one-night stands and trouble sleeping. Lonely, she is unable to make meaningful connections with colleagues or any of the men she dates. Then in what appears to be an unrelated case, the body of a young man, a murder victim, is washed up along the river, Cam. During the investigation Manon meets the appealing, but prickly, young brother of the dead man. This young boy tugs at her dormant heart strings, and he eventually leads Manon to reconnect with her estranged sister.
As the two cases converge, Edith's secrets are gradually revealed. First the reader must work his/her way through a number of red herrings and blind alleys. Steiner is an excellent writer. Her characters are real and sympathetic. I found the book more satisfying than some of the current crop of best sellers with "Girl" in their title. While I found Manon's story interesting, the final resolution and ending of the book disappointed. It was a tad too tidy. Nevertheless I recommend it as another satisfying British mystery novel.
Wednesday, October 19, 2016
Saturday, October 15, 2016
SPQR by Mary Beard (non-fic)
This is the perfect book to read after Robert Harris's Cicero series. Reading Beard's non-fiction account of the founding and early years of Roman democracy through the demise of the Empire adds another layer to the fine research Harris did for his novel of the end of Rome's democratic period. Mary Beard, professor of classics at Cambridge, has written a readable and interesting account of what propelled a small city on the Tiber to become a world power running the largest Empire in the ancient world. No surprise, perhaps, we find the Roman rulers grappling with the same problems as democracies in today's world: citizenship, political intrigue, class disparity, trade balance, and foreign wars and diplomacy. SPQR (Senatus Populus Que Romanus) answers the question what was the role of the Senate and citizens of Rome in the city and in the Empire.
It is debatable when Rome was actually founded; it was sometime around the 8th century, bce. What we think of as the glory days of Rome, began in the 4th and 3rd centuries, bce. This was the time of the great men who entered the world stage, statesmen and generals. By the 2nd century bce, 80,000 new slaves a year were being bought and sold on the streets of the city. The figures seem horrifying, but it was not unusual to free slaves after a period of service, and they in turn were granted citizenship and many became successful entrepreneurs and founders of dynasties. Gradually Rome became a mixed society, and by 212, the Emperor Caracalla granted citizenship to all conquered nations. This solved the problem of a ready supply of soldiers, and the taxation required to rule the Roman world. Greek became the common tongue, much as English is today. The Empire was diverse but not tolerant. Almost everybody came from somewhere else, but each was expected to fit in to the culture of Rome. This model eventually was the undoing of the Roman Empire. The role of women was flexible as society evolved. They had more rights after the time of Caesar, but were not liberated in the modern sense. The Roman model assured that the Empire should be administered rather than conquered.
Between 146 bce and the death of Caesar in 44 ce, was the high point of Roman literature, art and culture. Rome as a democracy did not last long. The assassination of Cicero marked the end of the Roman Republic and the once respected Senate became little more than a debating society. After Caesar, his great-nephew, Octavian (Caesar Augustus) defeated all rivals and ruled for 50 years. His was the most long-lived term. There were 14 Emperors until the fall of Rome and their qualities didn't much matter, the Empire survived despite their decadence and profligate life style. Most were murdered, yet the Empire survived.
Not many writings survived to enlighten us about the life of the average Roman citizen. Cicero's prolific letters, Livy's writing and that Pliny the Younger give us some idea, but they were from the aristocracy. Rather, the life of the common man is told in monuments and gravestones found all over Italy. They survive to enlighten us about families and tell us what people took pride in. Mary Beard did a wonderful series of programs called, "Meet the Romans" which can be found on UTube. These are informative companions to this book, and give an excellent picture of life in Imperial Rome.
I highly recommend this book to all who wish to know more about life and politics in the ancient world and what has survived as a model for the world we live in today.
It is debatable when Rome was actually founded; it was sometime around the 8th century, bce. What we think of as the glory days of Rome, began in the 4th and 3rd centuries, bce. This was the time of the great men who entered the world stage, statesmen and generals. By the 2nd century bce, 80,000 new slaves a year were being bought and sold on the streets of the city. The figures seem horrifying, but it was not unusual to free slaves after a period of service, and they in turn were granted citizenship and many became successful entrepreneurs and founders of dynasties. Gradually Rome became a mixed society, and by 212, the Emperor Caracalla granted citizenship to all conquered nations. This solved the problem of a ready supply of soldiers, and the taxation required to rule the Roman world. Greek became the common tongue, much as English is today. The Empire was diverse but not tolerant. Almost everybody came from somewhere else, but each was expected to fit in to the culture of Rome. This model eventually was the undoing of the Roman Empire. The role of women was flexible as society evolved. They had more rights after the time of Caesar, but were not liberated in the modern sense. The Roman model assured that the Empire should be administered rather than conquered.
Between 146 bce and the death of Caesar in 44 ce, was the high point of Roman literature, art and culture. Rome as a democracy did not last long. The assassination of Cicero marked the end of the Roman Republic and the once respected Senate became little more than a debating society. After Caesar, his great-nephew, Octavian (Caesar Augustus) defeated all rivals and ruled for 50 years. His was the most long-lived term. There were 14 Emperors until the fall of Rome and their qualities didn't much matter, the Empire survived despite their decadence and profligate life style. Most were murdered, yet the Empire survived.
Not many writings survived to enlighten us about the life of the average Roman citizen. Cicero's prolific letters, Livy's writing and that Pliny the Younger give us some idea, but they were from the aristocracy. Rather, the life of the common man is told in monuments and gravestones found all over Italy. They survive to enlighten us about families and tell us what people took pride in. Mary Beard did a wonderful series of programs called, "Meet the Romans" which can be found on UTube. These are informative companions to this book, and give an excellent picture of life in Imperial Rome.
I highly recommend this book to all who wish to know more about life and politics in the ancient world and what has survived as a model for the world we live in today.
Wednesday, October 5, 2016
FIRESTARTER by Stephen King (fic)
Early Stephen King novels are having a bit of a revival these days. The Guardian is currently doing a series reading the novels, and the current New York Review has a fine article on appreciating his work. All this happened just in time, as I am recovering from a mishap that resulted in a fractured kneecap. With plenty of time on my hands, I thought it would be good to try something different than my usual taste. My son sent me "Firestarter," assuring me I would enjoy it. Enjoy it I did. It was a good choice for a housebound reader. This is one of King's early books published in 1980, and it has had a resurgence in popularity, rated as one of the top 10 favorites among King fans. An old movie was also made of it. Pretty awful by all accounts. It starred Drew Barrymore when she was a youngster.
The book is typical of the early King writing, involving a chase with threatening pursuers and characters with otherworldly powers. It begins with a couple of young college students agreeing to take part in a drug experiment conducted by an organization known as "the Shop." (read CIA) Volunteers, Andy McGee and his girlfriend Vickey, whom he later married, were left with permanent damage including unwelcome psychic powers that they gradually learned to control. Andy was sometimes able to get into people's minds and direct them to do his bidding. Being a moral person, he rarely used his power and only in extreme circumstances. It always left Andy ill and depleted, suffering from intense migraines. Other victims of the experiment mysteriously came to bad ends. Somehow Andy and Vickey were able to escape detection for a number of years. Then they had a child, Charlie McGee, who is the main character at the center of the book. Charlie, it turns out, was born with a frightening ability known as pyrokinesis. As she grows, her gift becomes more destructive and dangerous. Because she is aware of the terrible consequences which are difficult for her to control, she refuses to use this ability.
Becoming aware of Charlie's power, the Shop, sends a hit-man named John Rainbird to kidnap her so they can study her and make use of her strange "gift." Railbird becomes obsessed with Charlie in a creepy way adding to the suspense. Once on the road, Charlie and her father manage to elude their pursuers as the action builds in suspense. They are saved early on by an New York farmer named Manders. He and his wife put them up for awhile, until the agents track them down. They manage to escape once again and hole up for the winter at Charlie's grandfather's cabin on a lake in Vermont.
The story takes off from here with suspense building and horrifying consequences.
I am not a fan of paranormal literature, but this is the second Stephen King book I have read, and despite my misgivings, I have to admit to enjoying them. King has a way of bringing the recent past to life by using product names and realistic settings. In this case the reader is transported back to the late sixties and seventies when the government was conducting experiments with various drugs and LSD on unwitting volunteers. Besides he is an excellent writer. His characters may be strange but they are believable. You might enjoy this book for a change of pace or even as a blast from the past.
The book is typical of the early King writing, involving a chase with threatening pursuers and characters with otherworldly powers. It begins with a couple of young college students agreeing to take part in a drug experiment conducted by an organization known as "the Shop." (read CIA) Volunteers, Andy McGee and his girlfriend Vickey, whom he later married, were left with permanent damage including unwelcome psychic powers that they gradually learned to control. Andy was sometimes able to get into people's minds and direct them to do his bidding. Being a moral person, he rarely used his power and only in extreme circumstances. It always left Andy ill and depleted, suffering from intense migraines. Other victims of the experiment mysteriously came to bad ends. Somehow Andy and Vickey were able to escape detection for a number of years. Then they had a child, Charlie McGee, who is the main character at the center of the book. Charlie, it turns out, was born with a frightening ability known as pyrokinesis. As she grows, her gift becomes more destructive and dangerous. Because she is aware of the terrible consequences which are difficult for her to control, she refuses to use this ability.
Becoming aware of Charlie's power, the Shop, sends a hit-man named John Rainbird to kidnap her so they can study her and make use of her strange "gift." Railbird becomes obsessed with Charlie in a creepy way adding to the suspense. Once on the road, Charlie and her father manage to elude their pursuers as the action builds in suspense. They are saved early on by an New York farmer named Manders. He and his wife put them up for awhile, until the agents track them down. They manage to escape once again and hole up for the winter at Charlie's grandfather's cabin on a lake in Vermont.
The story takes off from here with suspense building and horrifying consequences.
I am not a fan of paranormal literature, but this is the second Stephen King book I have read, and despite my misgivings, I have to admit to enjoying them. King has a way of bringing the recent past to life by using product names and realistic settings. In this case the reader is transported back to the late sixties and seventies when the government was conducting experiments with various drugs and LSD on unwitting volunteers. Besides he is an excellent writer. His characters may be strange but they are believable. You might enjoy this book for a change of pace or even as a blast from the past.
Friday, September 23, 2016
FAITHFUL PLACE by Tina French (fic)
No one does Irish mysteries like Tina French. I keep thinking she will run out of ideas, but she keeps turning them out. If you like her work, you will like this book. If you have been on a diet
of non-fiction or deep meaningful books, there is nothing like a good mystery or thriller to keep you turning pages. This book brings Frank Mackey back, and this time a body found in his old neighborhood of the Liberties, a downtrodden area of Dublin, causes him to rethink his past. Frank is an undercover detective with the Dublin crimes unit.
French's characters speak in idiomatic Dublin slang; their voices come through clear and lilting with all the rough edges intact. It has been 20 years since Mackey had been back to the old neighborhood, specifically Faithful Place, the cut-de-sac where he grew up with his four scrappy siblings and tough locals. He was 19 in 1985 when he fell deeply in love with Rosie Daly, a beautiful feisty neighbor. They made plans together to escape to England, leaving poverty and feuding families behind. Only that night, Rosie never showed up at their meeting place and Frank never saw her again. Agitated and distressed, Frank leaves his past behind, and the neighborhood where everyone lived too close and too long together. He never did get to England; instead he bounced around Dublin a bit, joined the force, and worked his way up to being a tough but respected detective. Along the way, he married and divorced and had a beloved daughter whom he wishes to protect from his manipulative mother and alcoholic and abusive father.
When Rosie's suitcase is found in an abandoned tenement house, Frank returns to work on the case. I will leave it there as the mystery deepens and we meet neighbors, family, and suspects, along with old feuds which have never died. I recommend this book to all lovers of well-written and well-plotted mystery novels.
of non-fiction or deep meaningful books, there is nothing like a good mystery or thriller to keep you turning pages. This book brings Frank Mackey back, and this time a body found in his old neighborhood of the Liberties, a downtrodden area of Dublin, causes him to rethink his past. Frank is an undercover detective with the Dublin crimes unit.
French's characters speak in idiomatic Dublin slang; their voices come through clear and lilting with all the rough edges intact. It has been 20 years since Mackey had been back to the old neighborhood, specifically Faithful Place, the cut-de-sac where he grew up with his four scrappy siblings and tough locals. He was 19 in 1985 when he fell deeply in love with Rosie Daly, a beautiful feisty neighbor. They made plans together to escape to England, leaving poverty and feuding families behind. Only that night, Rosie never showed up at their meeting place and Frank never saw her again. Agitated and distressed, Frank leaves his past behind, and the neighborhood where everyone lived too close and too long together. He never did get to England; instead he bounced around Dublin a bit, joined the force, and worked his way up to being a tough but respected detective. Along the way, he married and divorced and had a beloved daughter whom he wishes to protect from his manipulative mother and alcoholic and abusive father.
When Rosie's suitcase is found in an abandoned tenement house, Frank returns to work on the case. I will leave it there as the mystery deepens and we meet neighbors, family, and suspects, along with old feuds which have never died. I recommend this book to all lovers of well-written and well-plotted mystery novels.
Friday, September 16, 2016
THE GIRLS by Emma Cline (fic)
Emma Cline's first novel, is a loosely veiled fictional account of the Manson Family as seen through the eyes of a naive needy 14 year old. I have previously reviewed Jeff Guinn's excellent biography of Manson and I recommend that as reading for the real story of San Francisco in the Summer of Love.
The novel opens with the narrator, Evie Boyd, now an adult, living in a friend's isolated cabin. When a young relative and his very young girlfriend show up and stay for several days, it forces Evie to confront not only her own past, but the naiveté of the young girl, so reflective of herself in that long ago summer. She seems to carry the burden of her past much as Jacob Marley in the "Christmas Carol." Yet, Evie seems strangely passive and unable to help the young girl.
The reader is then taken back to the summer of 1969, leading up to the Tate/LaBianca murders in August of that year. In this novel, the Manson character is Russell Hadrick who preys on adrift young women. His fierce eyes render them helpless and he picks over them like choosing chocolates . Evie becomes involved with the family when they rescue her one day when her bicycle has broken down. The Girls of the title had been out on a dumpster dipping run and stopped their psychedelic bus to "help." There was no turning back for Evie, and she began making daily trips to the ranch. But, Evie's attraction to the ranch and it's grungy squalor had more to do with Suzanne Parker (the stand-in for Susan Atkins), who gave Evie the attention she so desperately craved. Evie's sad clueless mother and absent father hardly figure in her life. There is one horrifying scene when Russell pimps out Evie to an aging rock star (read /Denis Wilson of the Beach Boys) whom he is trying to get a record contract from. We sense Evie's fear even as she needs to belong. There is another scene when the girls break into the home of a neighbor of Evie's mother. It is a practice run for the final horrific event of the summer. Evie is shocked at the casualness of their destruction and Suzanne senses that Evie is not able to completely buy into the depth of their evil.
The book is well written and the characters, setting and time frame are all realistic. The sociopathic egomaniac Hadrick is especially horrifying. The characters are all well drawn and complete. I recommend the book for its fine writing, though the subject matter is difficult, it is presented as a study of the neediness of young girls who have been left behind and how quickly they can succumb to the crumbs of the attention they crave.
The novel opens with the narrator, Evie Boyd, now an adult, living in a friend's isolated cabin. When a young relative and his very young girlfriend show up and stay for several days, it forces Evie to confront not only her own past, but the naiveté of the young girl, so reflective of herself in that long ago summer. She seems to carry the burden of her past much as Jacob Marley in the "Christmas Carol." Yet, Evie seems strangely passive and unable to help the young girl.
The reader is then taken back to the summer of 1969, leading up to the Tate/LaBianca murders in August of that year. In this novel, the Manson character is Russell Hadrick who preys on adrift young women. His fierce eyes render them helpless and he picks over them like choosing chocolates . Evie becomes involved with the family when they rescue her one day when her bicycle has broken down. The Girls of the title had been out on a dumpster dipping run and stopped their psychedelic bus to "help." There was no turning back for Evie, and she began making daily trips to the ranch. But, Evie's attraction to the ranch and it's grungy squalor had more to do with Suzanne Parker (the stand-in for Susan Atkins), who gave Evie the attention she so desperately craved. Evie's sad clueless mother and absent father hardly figure in her life. There is one horrifying scene when Russell pimps out Evie to an aging rock star (read /Denis Wilson of the Beach Boys) whom he is trying to get a record contract from. We sense Evie's fear even as she needs to belong. There is another scene when the girls break into the home of a neighbor of Evie's mother. It is a practice run for the final horrific event of the summer. Evie is shocked at the casualness of their destruction and Suzanne senses that Evie is not able to completely buy into the depth of their evil.
The book is well written and the characters, setting and time frame are all realistic. The sociopathic egomaniac Hadrick is especially horrifying. The characters are all well drawn and complete. I recommend the book for its fine writing, though the subject matter is difficult, it is presented as a study of the neediness of young girls who have been left behind and how quickly they can succumb to the crumbs of the attention they crave.
Tuesday, September 13, 2016
ENCHANTMENTS by Kathryn Harrison (fic)
Katherine Harrison has written a number of books, all with interesting characters and settings. This time she turned to the last days of the Russian Empire. The story of the last Tsar and the end of the Romanov dynasty is familiar to us. We know the Tsarina Alexandra became infatuated with the mad monk, Rasputin with his healing powers. But, what I didn't know was that Rasputin was married and had three children. This is the fictional story of one of his children, loosely based on her fascinating life.
The story opens at Tsarskoe Selo, Catherine the Great's opulent winter palace (now a museum). The royal family await their fate there. The heir to the throne, Prince Aloysha, is one of a number of decendents of Queen Victoria of England, who is afflicted with Hemophilia. In a vain attempt to cure him, Tsarina Alexandra turns to Grigori Rasputin, a reputed healer and poor peasant from the steppes of Siberia. Rasputin is slovenly, alcoholic, dirty, and magnetic. People of all classes are drawn to him by his intense eyes and reported sexual prowess. Rumors abound about his influence over the Royal Family and strange relationship with the Tsarina. As the situation becomes intolerable, a group of aristocrats get together and murder Rasputin. This proves a difficult task; the drunken monk is poisoned with no result; they then stab him and still he struggles on; finally, in desperation they bundle him into a sack and toss him into the icy Neva.
Mourning and unconsolable, Alexandria summons Rasputin's daughters to the Palace, hoping one of them, Masha, has inherited her father's powers of healing. Instead Masha becomes a friend and confidant to the lonely Prince. As the restrictions intensify around the Romanovs, Masha in an effort to entertain Aloysha, begins to tell him fascinating stories which are the enchantments of the title.
The novel veers back and forth between Masha's life with her family and father, and that as witness to the final days of the Romanov family.
Harrison is an entertaining writer and her descriptions of the palaces and other prisons of the family ring authentic. Her descriptive writing is at its best when describing the preparations and purification of the body of her father. Masha and her father's Housekeeper/Mistress work together, wordlessly preparing the body for burial.
I wish Harrison had dwelt more on Masha's life after the murder of the Romanov's. We know she escaped to Paris with an abusive husband, had two children, became a circus performer, eventually an American citizen, wrote a memoir and married a second time. She had quite a life.
The weakest part of the book for me was her relationship with Prince Aloysha and the non-development of any of the Romanov sisters. Still, it is an entertaining read and a different take on the tragedy of the Russian Royal Family.
The story opens at Tsarskoe Selo, Catherine the Great's opulent winter palace (now a museum). The royal family await their fate there. The heir to the throne, Prince Aloysha, is one of a number of decendents of Queen Victoria of England, who is afflicted with Hemophilia. In a vain attempt to cure him, Tsarina Alexandra turns to Grigori Rasputin, a reputed healer and poor peasant from the steppes of Siberia. Rasputin is slovenly, alcoholic, dirty, and magnetic. People of all classes are drawn to him by his intense eyes and reported sexual prowess. Rumors abound about his influence over the Royal Family and strange relationship with the Tsarina. As the situation becomes intolerable, a group of aristocrats get together and murder Rasputin. This proves a difficult task; the drunken monk is poisoned with no result; they then stab him and still he struggles on; finally, in desperation they bundle him into a sack and toss him into the icy Neva.
Mourning and unconsolable, Alexandria summons Rasputin's daughters to the Palace, hoping one of them, Masha, has inherited her father's powers of healing. Instead Masha becomes a friend and confidant to the lonely Prince. As the restrictions intensify around the Romanovs, Masha in an effort to entertain Aloysha, begins to tell him fascinating stories which are the enchantments of the title.
The novel veers back and forth between Masha's life with her family and father, and that as witness to the final days of the Romanov family.
Harrison is an entertaining writer and her descriptions of the palaces and other prisons of the family ring authentic. Her descriptive writing is at its best when describing the preparations and purification of the body of her father. Masha and her father's Housekeeper/Mistress work together, wordlessly preparing the body for burial.
I wish Harrison had dwelt more on Masha's life after the murder of the Romanov's. We know she escaped to Paris with an abusive husband, had two children, became a circus performer, eventually an American citizen, wrote a memoir and married a second time. She had quite a life.
The weakest part of the book for me was her relationship with Prince Aloysha and the non-development of any of the Romanov sisters. Still, it is an entertaining read and a different take on the tragedy of the Russian Royal Family.
Monday, September 12, 2016
DICTATOR by Robert Harris (fic)
This is the final book in Harris's Ciceronian Trilogy, the others being: "Imperium" and "Lustrous." The books follow the great orator, philosopher, and Roman Consul, Marcus Tulles Cicero as he threads his way through the politics of the waning Roman Republic. The story is narrated by his secretary, Tiro, a slave whom Cicero eventually frees. Tiro is a natural guide to Cicero's daily life in perilous times without inserting himself into the action, except in a very minor way.
The novel opens in 58bce during one of the most contested times in the Republic. If you have read any history of this time, it soon becomes clear that Harris has done a prodigious amount of research. He remarkably has inserted Cicero's real words into the dialog allowing the reader to hear Cicero's voice in a easy and natural manner. Cicero left behind thousands of letters and documents and speeches which the real Tiro copied assiduously, along the way inventing an early form of shorthand. It is largely thanks to the labor of medieval monks who faithfully copied and saved these precious documents that we so well know the demise of the Republic. So it is that Cicero's words come down to us while so many others have been destroyed.
The reader cannot help but draw parallels between the politicking in the Roman Senate and what is going on in our world today. The Romans were involved in nagging wars on several fronts, the wealth was held by a small group of aristocratic families, the poor were confined in a warren of apartments owned by slum landlords. The aging Cicero was fairly adept at the game but more than once he became enmeshed in risky moves and was banished accordingly. The book opens on one of these exiles where he is jockeying to return to Rome as Julius Caesar is off-stage conquering Gaul and later the British Isles. The first Triumvirate of Caesar, Pompey and Crassus is becoming unraveled and plots and counterplots are taking place daily making speaking out in the Senate a dangerous game. Cicero very bravely speaks his mind over and over on the floor of the Senate when he returns from exile, only to be sent away again to govern a Provence in the eastern Mediterranean. In order to return a second time, he promises not to involve himself in politics, but soon he is back on his game speaking out against Mark Antony after Caesar's assassination.
Cicero believed in the validity of the constitution and the Republic, nevertheless he was a catalyst in helping to bring it down. He believed in Octavian, Caesar's nephew, when he said he would defend the Republic. Realizing his mistake, and unable to keep his own counsel, Cicero fled again, already poor in health and close to death. He asks: "Can a constitution devised centuries ago to replace a monarchy, and based upon a citizens' militia, possibly hope to run and empire whose scope is beyond anything ever dreamed of by its framers? Or must the existence of standing armies and the influx of inconceivable wealth destroy our democratic system?"
I highly recommend this book to lovers of ancient history and to all interested in a good story. It helps to have read the first two books, but not necessary. This book can stand alone, as well. It is also a good book club choice because of the comparison with modern times.
The novel opens in 58bce during one of the most contested times in the Republic. If you have read any history of this time, it soon becomes clear that Harris has done a prodigious amount of research. He remarkably has inserted Cicero's real words into the dialog allowing the reader to hear Cicero's voice in a easy and natural manner. Cicero left behind thousands of letters and documents and speeches which the real Tiro copied assiduously, along the way inventing an early form of shorthand. It is largely thanks to the labor of medieval monks who faithfully copied and saved these precious documents that we so well know the demise of the Republic. So it is that Cicero's words come down to us while so many others have been destroyed.
The reader cannot help but draw parallels between the politicking in the Roman Senate and what is going on in our world today. The Romans were involved in nagging wars on several fronts, the wealth was held by a small group of aristocratic families, the poor were confined in a warren of apartments owned by slum landlords. The aging Cicero was fairly adept at the game but more than once he became enmeshed in risky moves and was banished accordingly. The book opens on one of these exiles where he is jockeying to return to Rome as Julius Caesar is off-stage conquering Gaul and later the British Isles. The first Triumvirate of Caesar, Pompey and Crassus is becoming unraveled and plots and counterplots are taking place daily making speaking out in the Senate a dangerous game. Cicero very bravely speaks his mind over and over on the floor of the Senate when he returns from exile, only to be sent away again to govern a Provence in the eastern Mediterranean. In order to return a second time, he promises not to involve himself in politics, but soon he is back on his game speaking out against Mark Antony after Caesar's assassination.
Cicero believed in the validity of the constitution and the Republic, nevertheless he was a catalyst in helping to bring it down. He believed in Octavian, Caesar's nephew, when he said he would defend the Republic. Realizing his mistake, and unable to keep his own counsel, Cicero fled again, already poor in health and close to death. He asks: "Can a constitution devised centuries ago to replace a monarchy, and based upon a citizens' militia, possibly hope to run and empire whose scope is beyond anything ever dreamed of by its framers? Or must the existence of standing armies and the influx of inconceivable wealth destroy our democratic system?"
I highly recommend this book to lovers of ancient history and to all interested in a good story. It helps to have read the first two books, but not necessary. This book can stand alone, as well. It is also a good book club choice because of the comparison with modern times.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)